Idaho Student Killings Suspect Bryan Kohberger's Chilling Essay Suggests He Knew His Way Around A Crime Scene

Essay written by a suspected murder in Idaho Brian Coberger It sparked speculation that he knew how to cover his truck.

The 30-year-old has not been released on bail since being arrested for killing University of Idaho students Madison Morgen, Kaylee Goncalves, Zana Carnodor and Ethan Chapin at their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho.

The revelation follows previous reports that prosecutors say they may call on Brian Coberger’s family as witnesses in future trials.

Brian Coberger’s murder defense has become more challenging after Idaho prosecutors revealed a university essay that showed him a deep understanding of the crime scene.

According to New York PostIn an unsettling essay, Kohberger detailed how crime scene investigators use “fiberless” overalls, gloves and booties to prevent evidence of contamination with their own DNA and fingerprints.

Kohberger also repeatedly highlighted the importance of investigating multiple aspects of crime scene investigations and protecting areas from contamination. He further noted that domestic partners are often the leading suspects in criminal cases.

In another part of the essay, Kohberger discussed how perpetrators could introduce items to crime scenes to mislead investigators. He also warned investigators against rushing conclusions in such a scenario.

“Even if there are items featured at the scene by criminals to force an investigator to drop him out of the investigator, it’s not a job for criminal investigators to handle the crime scene and jump to conclusions,” Kohberger wrote in his calm work.

Speaking about the essay, crime scene expert Joseph Jacaron argued that it would be one of the key evidence against Coberger in his upcoming trial.

“Prosecutors will talk about this when it brings about a lack of forensic evidence left by the murderer,” a former NYPD cold case investigator said.

He added, “They’re going to say, ‘Look at how much he knows about this. He’s talking about clothes that are not textile.” This is useless for him. ”

Giacalone also said that Kohberger’s essay could explain whether police could only recover minimal forensic evidence and explain why he suggested he had tried to cover his truck.

However, despite the murder weapon (knife) still disappearing, police found the sheath at the crime scene containing Coberger’s DNA.

Prosecutors have since theorized that Coberger has bought a knife and a sheath from Amazon and intends to show his shopping history at his trial.

According to court documents, Kohberger purchased a black balaclava nearly a year before the witness reported seeing a masked man inside the murder home.

Prosecutors revealed that the murderer covered his face on January 10, 2022 at Dick’s sports goods store in Pittsburgh, 11 months before the fatal stab wound on November 13, 2022.

They also pointed out Kohberger’s online shopping history. This includes purchasing combat style knives, sheaths and sharpeners from Amazon about eight months before the attack.

A knife sheath containing Kohberger’s DNA was later recovered at the crime scene. Additionally, witness Dylan Mortensen told police that he saw the man wearing a similar mask on the night of the murder inside the King Road residence.

They later provided a drawing of the cover. This was included in a court filing filed by Coberger’s defense counsel, Elisa Massoth. New York Post.

Previously, it was revealed that Coberger’s family might testify at his trial after prosecutors opposed the family’s request for a priority seat.

“The state can call members of the Coberger family and testify at trial,” Ashley Jennings, assistant prosecutor Ashley Jennings, wrote in a court application to Judge Stephen Hippler.

She said, “Before the start of a trial, the state expects it to move the court, or the court will exclude from the court from testimony so that the court agrees on its own and generally cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses.”

Disputing the granting of a seat of priority for the Kohberger family, Jennings argued that the accused relatives do not own the same legal rights as the victim’s family.

“The defendant requests that members of his family be granted the same rights as the victim’s family,” Jennings said. “However, “immediate family of murder victims” has a constitutional and statutory right to attend in accordance with the Idaho Constitution. There is no equivalent constitutional or statutory clause that provides these same rights to the defendant’s family. ”

Jennings also argued that Coberger’s family is not given priority, and that it would not violate his Sixth Amendment rights, contrary to his defense team’s claims.

“The defendant has constitutional and statutory rights to a ‘public trial’, but that does not fall short of the defendant’s choice of someone sitting in court,” the prosecutor included in her submission.