Idaho Murders Suspect Bryan Kohberger's Case Takes New Turn As Prosecutors Mull Calling His Family To Testify

Brian Coberger At his upcoming murder trial, he could potentially face testimony from his own family.

The 30-year-old is currently accused of quadruple murders, including University of Idaho students Madison Morgen, Kaylee Goncalves, Zana Kardor and Ethan Chapin of Moscow, Moscow, Idaho.

Brian Coberger’s lawyers had asked his family to be given priority at trial, but prosecutors opposed it in a recent filing.

Earlier this month, Kohberger’s legal team requested that the judge in his murder be acknowledged his family’s priorities in his upcoming trials.

However, the prosecutors have now partially denied the request and urged the judge to ban potential witnesses from Kohberger’s family from attending trial before providing testimony.

“The state can call members of the Coberger family to testify at trial,” Lata County Prosecutor Deputy Ashley Jennings wrote that he filed it with Judge Stephen Hippler in court. New York Post.

She said, “Before the start of a trial, the state expects it to move the court, or the court will exclude from the court from testimony so that the court agrees on its own and generally cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses.”

Elsewhere in the filing, Jennings argued that the accused family members do not have the same legal rights as the victim.

“The defendant requires members of his family to grant the same rights as the victim’s family,” Jennings continued. “However, “immediate family of murder victims” has a constitutional and statutory right to attend in accordance with the Idaho Constitution. There is no equivalent constitutional or statutory clause that provides these same rights to the defendant’s family. ”

Jennings also shut down Coberger’s lawyer’s claim that not giving his family priority would violate his Sixth Amendment Rights.

“The defendant has constitutional and statutory rights to a ‘public trial’, but that does not fall short of the defendant’s choice of someone sitting in court,” the prosecutor included in her submission.

Important evidence for future trials is the knife sheath where Kohberger’s DNA was found at the murder scene.

His lawyers attempted to throw away the knife sheath by insisting that Hippler would close the hearing of Frank.

Recently, they have brought national defense experts to ask them to testify against Kohberger’s prosecutor’s theory of Amazon shopping history.

The testimony was intended to exclude Kohberger’s Amazon shopping records and to convince the judge to “click on the activity” from the ju apprentice.

But, just like Franks’ hearing, Hippler opposed the demands from Coberger’s attorney.

“Information that is attempting to convey information can be presented by declaration,” Hippler wrote in order. Fox News. “Attorneys may be able to use witnesses through video streaming during a hearing and if the court determines that contact from the witness is necessary, the court may allow such testimony via video live stream.”

Despite the verdict, Kohberger’s legal team is likely to reintroduce the discovery of unidentified genetic material during his trial.

Sources previously argued that the team could help “mold the waters” and create reasonable doubt in the minds of ju-referees.

“The evidence can be a variety of things. It could be something, or there may be nothing,” criminal defense attorney Edwina Elcox said of the newly discovered DNA. “At least there’s something to be made with it, and it’s better than having nothing as a defense.”

However, Elcox admitted that his DNA on the knife sheath is “critical” and he is not strong enough to win Coberger’s innocence.

“It’s about putting the front there,” the female lawyer said of the knife sheath. “The magnitude of that evidence for state cases is important and cannot be kept modest.”

Kohberger’s trial is scheduled for August this year and will be held in Boise, Idaho. Initially it was scheduled to take place in Moscow, Idaho, where the murder occurred, but his defense argued for a change in venue by citing concerns over a possible unfair trial.

The minutes will first focus on determining whether a 30-year-old is guilty of four charges of first-degree murder and one count of robbery.

If convicted, another stage will be held to determine whether he should receive the death penalty, as the murder charge will be subject to the death penalty in the state.

The case is expected to be extended until November due to the possibility of a two-phase trial. The judge’s choice is expected to begin in late July once all pretrial moves are addressed.

For now, Kohberger has pleaded not guilty and is in custody without bail while awaiting trial.